During the parliamentary session on Tuesday, Cyril Hart, a member of the House of Representatives from Rivers State, walked out of the session in protest. He accused the Deputy Speaker of favoring senior members over new ones in debates. Hart, who represents Degema/Bonny Federal Constituency and belongs to the Peoples Democratic Party, voiced his concerns after a motion was raised concerning recent suicide bombings in Borno State.
The motion prompted discussions among several lawmakers, including Idris Wase, Chairman of the House Committee on Navy, and Babajimi Benson, Chairman of the Committee on Defence. These members, who are considered senior in the chamber, were given the chance to speak by Kalu, who was presiding over the session in the absence of Speaker Tajudeen Abbas.
Criticism arose when Hart observed that most of those allowed to speak were senior members. He interrupted proceedings, stating, “You do not give preference to first-timers. You don’t.” His outburst gained applause from fellow lawmakers sympathetic to his viewpoint. Hart continued, “Virtually all those who spoke are ranking members. This is what you always do. You need to allow first-timers to make their contributions.”
In response, Kalu defended the fairness of the proceedings, asserting, “There is no discrimination in the parliament. I was also a first-timer at a time.” He explained that speaking opportunities are often based on seating arrangements, and those not in designated areas may not be recognized.
Frustrated by the perceived bias, Hart walked out of the chamber, voicing his discontent as he left. His actions highlighted ongoing tensions regarding the equitable participation of newer members in parliamentary debates.
The incident underscored broader issues within the legislative body regarding the inclusivity of all members, regardless of seniority. It raised questions about how parliamentary procedures could better accommodate new lawmakers, ensuring their voices are heard alongside those of more experienced colleagues.
This event serves as a reminder of the challenges faced by new legislators in asserting their influence within established parliamentary structures. It also points to the importance of fair representation and inclusivity in democratic decision-making processes, crucial for upholding the principles of representative governance.